Home ยป Decrease in depression, anxiety PTSD at Oregon psilocybin centers

Decrease in depression, anxiety PTSD at Oregon psilocybin centers

by Team SunilMadhavs World
Safety and Clinical Outcomes of State-Regulated Psilocybin Services: Findings From the OPEN Cohort Study
Based on findings from the Open Psychedelic Evaluation Nexus (OPEN) longitudinal cohort study published in JAMA Network Open.
Following Oregonโ€™s 2020 ballot initiative legalizing state-monitored, licensed access to psilocybin, investigators initiated the Open Psychedelic Evaluation Nexus (OPEN) cohort study to evaluate participant safety, clinical outcomes, and subjective experiences.
Highlighting the public health imperative driving the investigation, P. Todd Korthuis, MD, MPH, professor of medicine at the Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, stated:
โ€œWhen Oregon voters passed a ballot initiative in 2020 to permit state-licensed access to psilocybin services, our group of interdisciplinary researchers talked about the need to learn about the safety and outcomes of this first-in-the-nation initiative.โ€

Study Cohort and Intervention Design

The OPEN study recruited 346 individuals receiving state-regulated psilocybin administration across 24 licensed service centers in Oregon between November 2024 and March 2026. Administered psilocybin doses averaged 31.9 mg (range, 2โ€“50 mg). The cohort demonstrated high longitudinal retention: 93.1% at 1 week, 92.8% at 1 month, and 90.2% at 3 months.
Table 1. Baseline Demographics, Pre-Treatment Substance Use, and Motivations ($N = 346$)
Parameter Specification / Distribution
Demographics
Mean age (years) 49.5
Sex: Female 52.5%
Race: White 86.7%
Psychedelic Background
Psychedelic-naรฏve 44.2%
Prior psychedelic experience 55.8%
Substance Use (Prior 30 Days)
Alcohol 58.7%
Cannabis 36.7%
Nicotine / Tobacco 11.0%
Primary Motivations for Participation*
Self-improvement 68.5%
Managing mental health symptoms 64.5%
Navigating psychological trauma 51.4%
Greater connection with people, Earth, or nature 45.1%
*Categories were not mutually exclusive.

Psychiatric Symptom Trajectories and Well-Being

Assessment of moderate-to-severe psychiatric symptoms demonstrated marked decreases across all evaluated symptom domains from baseline through 3 months of follow-up. Concurrent improvements were identified in psychological well-being and life satisfaction.
Table 2. Psychiatric Symptoms, Well-Being Scores, and Quality of Life Measures
Clinical Endpoint / Metric Baseline Rate / Score 1-Month Follow-Up 3-Month Follow-Up Statistical Metric (vs Baseline)
Moderate-to-Severe Depression 42.2% โ€” 16.5% RR = 0.40 (95% CI, 0.32โ€“0.50)
Moderate-to-Severe Anxiety 45.1% โ€” 13.2% RR = 0.29 (95% CI, 0.22โ€“0.38)
Moderate-to-Severe PTSD Symptoms 48.0% โ€” 16.8% RR = 0.35 (95% CI, 0.27โ€“0.45)
Mean Mental Well-Being Score 22.1 26.2 25.3 Mean Difference = 3.21 (95% CI, 2.66โ€“3.76)
Life Satisfaction Rate 63.0% 83.4% 82.3% RR = 1.31 (95% CI, 1.19โ€“1.44)

Participant Satisfaction, Perceptions, and Safety Signals

At 1 month post-administration, participants reported high satisfaction with facilitator and facility care, as well as positive appraisals of overall value.
Safety surveillance revealed no serious adverse medical events. However, 4 participants experienced severe behavioral adverse reactions during administration sessions, 1 of which required acute healthcare intervention. All 4 individuals were psychedelic-naรฏve, had enrolled specifically to address treatment-refractory psychiatric symptoms, and 2 were actively prescribed psychiatric medications. Perceptions of personal harm remained low throughout observation (1.6% at 1 week; 1.9% at 1 month; 2.3% at 3 months).
Reflecting on the acute safety profile, Dr. Korthuis noted:
โ€œWe were struck by the low incidence of serious adverse reactions.โ€
He summarized the overall findings:
โ€œOregon-regulated psilocybin services appear to be safe and associated with improved mental health and wellbeing. While promising, these early results need to be confirmed by comparing groups receiving psilocybin services with a control group of people who donโ€™t access state psilocybin services.โ€
Table 3. Self-Reported Satisfaction, Valuation, and Adverse Safety Events
Outcome Domain Evaluated Parameter Reported Rate (%)
Provider & Facility Evaluation (1 Month) Endorsed session facilitator 96.0%
Endorsed state-licensed service center 95.6%
Personal & Life Appraisals (1 Month) Achieved a broader life perspective 89.4%
Accomplished self-made goals 81.6%
Perceived overall personal benefit 92.2%
Meaningful / comparable to highly valued life events 58.6%
Economic Perceptions Reported service cost caused financial strain 32.1%
Endorsed intervention as worth the financial cost 81.0%
Adverse Events & Perceived Harm Serious medical adverse events 0.0% ($n = 0$)
Serious behavioral adverse reactions 1.15% ($n = 4$)
Behavioral reactions requiring healthcare intervention 0.29% ($n = 1$)
Experience perceived as harmful at 1 week 1.6%
Experience perceived as harmful at 1 month 1.9%
Experience perceived as harmful at 3 months 2.3%

Invited Commentary: Diagnostic Validity and Selection Bias

In an accompanying perspective, Walter S. Dunn, MD, PhD (UCLA Department of Psychiatry; Co-Director, UCLA Psychiatry Residency Neuromodulation Program), emphasized key methodological caveats regarding generalizability to true clinical psychiatric populations:
  • Absence of Formal Psychiatric Diagnoses: Participants were not verified through formal diagnostic evaluations. Reductions on screening scales (such as PHQ-9 or PCL-5) do not confirm DSM-defined major depressive disorder or PTSD. The clearest indicators of formal psychiatric illness were restricted to the 4 patients who developed acute behavioral reactions (two of whom were prescribed psychotropic drugs). If the broader cohort comprised largely non-clinical individuals seeking wellness, reported safety and efficacy metrics cannot be extrapolated directly to psychiatric cohorts.
  • Positive Selection Bias via Prior Exposure: More than half of participants had prior psychedelic experience. Individuals who have had severe, frightening, or destabilizing reactions to psychedelics in the past are unlikely to voluntarily pay for state-licensed sessions. Consequently, the cohort was enriched with individuals preselected for biological and psychological tolerability.
  • Recommendations for Future Studies: Future evaluations must systematically stratify clinical endpoints based on baseline diagnostic verification and psychedelic-naรฏve versus psychedelic-experienced status.

You may also like

Leave a Comment


Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?